Board

EBCL

Screened
SCREENEDClearing

Ebb Clear

They killed 13 sentences to get listed. That is the product you are about to miss.

Renewal — not the round — is the twelve-month test. The people in this queue already know that.

Ebb Clear — A permissioned netting engine for trading venues and brokers that are already licensed. It reduces what has to settle. It is not a new CCP, and it is not a collateral token.

Screened, not yet in sprint. Treat every number as provisional. Calendar access is not automatic.

They unpublish in an hour. They will not wait for your committee to finish reading.

Diligence, not a prospectus. RCA Pad does not allocate, take orders, or close funding. If this company raises, it raises with its own counsel.

Stage

upcoming

Window

0days

Heat

0/99

Inbound / wk

0asks

Asking now

0live

Named pilots

0

Redacted on the public page

Live nodes

0

Permissioned netting

Counsel hours

0

Undetermined — not a path

Sentences killed

0

Before listing

Claims live

0/5

Sprint

Our cut

0%

Of any proceeds

Plate Orbit · 3520

EBCL

The plate

Orbit. Edition 3520.

A unique plate for Ebb Clear. Geometry, orbit, and edition belong to this company — no other listing on the board shares it.

EBCL · Brussels · Clearing

Score

0

Desk diligence

Pilots

0

None on file

Stage

upcoming

upcoming

HQ

Brussels

Licensed venues

Sells

Member

Member seat

Markets

0

Brussels

Years

0

Founded 2025

Surfaces

0

Permissioned netting

Complete

0

File readiness

The wedge

Member seat

The wedge is T+1: gross settlement got expensive overnight.

Why the desk took it

Early — still a question.

They did not claim to be a CCP. Counsel will still ask.

Traction

No paying pilot on the public file.

Founded 2025, headquartered in Brussels. No named paying pilot on the file yet — that is the first question. 3 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 73/100. A qualified custodian reconciling against this book. They killed their own ‘token as fee’ sentence before we asked. Rare, and it scored.

Next 12 months

Two members netting live, or stop.

A DeFi clearinghouse is a different, usually unlicensed, business. They sell a fee the customer already pays a slower vendor for. TAM is that invoice, not a token float.

The brief

How a serious reader should hold this.

In Brussels, the person who signs the monthly pack already has a vendor. Ebb Clear is not asking them to believe in a token. It is asking them to move one job — the one that currently lives in a spreadsheet, a fax, or a person who is about to retire — onto a record that can be shown to counsel. The queue to read that record is already not empty.

The bet is narrow. A named Brussels buyer already has budget for this invoice. Ebb Clear wins if it is cheaper than the internal build and cleaner than the protocol pitch. It loses if a founder later wants a public book. The window is the time you have to decide which it is.

The auditor of a redacted pilot has seen a dual-record. Switching away now means a new auditor conversation. That is the switching cost — not the logo.

From the screen

The legal source of truth stays with the incumbent register, admin, or custodian. Ebb Clear does not attest to its own facts.

From the founder

A dual-control drill exists on paper. Production evidence is the next artefact, not a tweet.

From the pilot

US persons are outside the audience. A form that asks “are you accredited?” without verification is not an exemption.

The window

Miss this and you read the archive.

Skip it and you read the archive. Counterparties who matter will have already asked.

Switching cost is the auditor conversation. Once it happens, you are late.

If you are a founder who wants a pack like this: apply. If you are a buyer: call them — not us.

Window remaining

0days

When this window closes, the campaign is archive.

Sentences killed
13
Counsel hours on file
6
Asks / week
6
Our cut
0% of proceeds

We would rather be archive-clean than live-loud. The waitlist showed up anyway.

Claire Novak, Chief executive

This company

Ebb Clear

Open-source looks free until the auditor asks who attests. Ebb Clear has an answer.

In the same conversation

  • LCH / Eurex (incumbent CCPs)
  • Caldastone-style utilities
  • Not a DeFi clearinghouse

The bet

Why this company exists.

The wedge is T+1: gross settlement got expensive overnight.

The wedge is T+1: gross settlement got expensive overnight.

T+1 and capital rules make gross settlement expensive. Venues will buy netting as a service before they will buy a new licence.

Post-trade cost is a line on every broker P&L. A 10% cut in settlement fails is a CFO conversation.

Versus the field

L2 wrappers are cheaper. They are also a different perimeter — and declined here. Ebb Clear is priced as software against an invoice that already exists.

Named: Brussels, United Kingdom. Off-limits: United States retail, United States. A US person hearing an offering communication is a US problem even if the company sits in Brussels. Blocking an IP and taking a US Telegram admin is not a block.

How it works

  1. 01Members post positions they already hold
  2. 02The engine nets what the rulebook allows
  3. 03Only the residual hits the existing settlement rail
  4. 04Collateral as a token is an exclusion on this file
  5. 05Only the residual hits the existing settlement rail — gross never leaves the venue
  6. 06The legal source of truth stays with the incumbent register, admin, or custodian.

In the same conversation as

  • LCH / Eurex (incumbent CCPs)
  • Caldastone-style utilities
  • Not a DeFi clearinghouse

If they raise

Where the money would actually go.

Not a token float. A budget against work. RCA Pad still takes 0% of proceeds.

  • Control environment

    33%

    Dual-control drills, key ceremonies, and the person who owns them.

  • Second market

    27%

    Adapter work against the incumbent register, admin, or custodian.

  • Counsel & perimeter

    14%

    Hiring the operator who already does this job at a licensed firm.

  • Named operators

    26%

    A counsel memo that can survive a later reader.

Operating week

What “in market” actually looks like.

  1. SatDarkNo creators. No threads. Restricted geos stay dark.
  2. WedCounselPerimeter diffs. If the site drifted from the memo, the site moves — not the memo.
  3. SunOwnersWho can decide messaging and budget on a recorded line. If the answer is nobody, stop.
  4. TueExceptionsOvernight breaks post back into the customer’s case system. No side book.

The wedge

Why this one, not the other one.

They sell
Member seat
Who pays
A qualified custodian reconciling against this book.
Unit economics
They sell a fee the customer already pays a slower vendor for. TAM is that invoice, not a token float.
Moat on file
Named venue LOIs — redacted, but they exist.
Switching cost
Network effects only if a second named counterparty writes. One customer is a service firm.
Vs the comps
A DeFi clearinghouse is a different, usually unlicensed, business.
Why we listed it
They did not claim to be a CCP. Counsel will still ask.

Next twelve months

What has to be true.

Two members netting live, or stop.

They killed their own ‘token as fee’ sentence before we asked. Rare, and it scored.

Growth money would extend the record to a second geography, still permissioned.

Traction

What you can verify today.

Founded 2025, headquartered in Brussels. No named paying pilot on the file yet — that is the first question. 3 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 73/100. A qualified custodian reconciling against this book. They killed their own ‘token as fee’ sentence before we asked. Rare, and it scored.

  • Architecture paper — no production customer on the public file
  • No token contract listed as a public sale
  • Named founder; customer still a conversation
  • Brussels is the operating centre
  • The waitlist, if any, is a product list — not a book
  • RCA Pad does not take a cut of proceeds

Readiness

Six things a serious buyer asks. 100 is “ready to take to counsel and a customer.”

  • Product21
  • Customers18
  • Legal path24
  • Tech maturity37
  • Demand10
  • Market access68

Risks

What can kill it.

The one that actually kills it

The named customer is a letter of intent

Pilots that cannot be named, even redacted, are theatre. One paying seat that an auditor has seen is worth more than a waitlist of a short list.

CCP perimeter

If a regulator reads this as clearing, the licence problem is existential.

Collateral token

That ask has been refused on files like this. It should stay refused.

Member default

Who eats the loss? If the answer is ‘the protocol’, there is no protocol that can.

Incumbent freeze-out

CCPs can copy the netting logic faster than a startup can collect members.

CCP copy

The incumbent can ship the same netting as a feature. Ebb Clear has to be cheaper or faster before that happens.

Path silence

If counsel will not name a path and not-offering is not locked, heated waitlist copy is an accidental offering.

Ask these next

  1. 01Has counsel written the perimeter in a memo you can file?
  2. 02Who is the first named paying customer — not a letter of intent?
  3. 03Who can unpublish a public sentence in 24 hours, by name?
  4. 04Where do keys, title, or NAV liability sit — and is that person licensed?
  5. 05Which geography is actually locked, and which is a hope?
  6. 06Is the waitlist demand for a product, or a queue for a coin?

Structure

How money would actually move.

Too early to talk about a round on this pad. Screen first. A path has to be named by counsel before anyone should wire.

Entity
Ebb Clear Ltd
Path on file
Undetermined — not a path
Posture
No public sale
Pack
Sprint

Where they can operate

Named vs off-limits.

Named markets are where a sentence is allowed. Restricted is where it is not. This is not a worldwide offering.

  • Brusselsnamed
  • United Kingdomnamed
  • United States retailrestricted
  • United Statesrestricted

Team

Who runs it.

  • Claire NovakChief executive
  • Claire ParkChief compliance

Stack

  • Permissioned netting
  • Clearing
  • Approval trail
  • Disclosure templates

Named with them

  • Clearline

Who can decide

Claire Novak (Chief executive) will take a 30-minute call and decide budget. If the only person who can accept “we are not opening a sale” is a silent co-founder in another time zone, this company would not be on the board.

A second counterparty writing into the record is the only network effect that counts. One customer is a consultancy. Two is a market.

Claims with evidence

Statements with evidence.

StatementEvidenceStatus
Ebb Clear does not sell a token to the public on this padPosture locklive
The product is clearing sold to institutionsArchitecture + customer typedraft
Permissioned netting is the method — not a listed assetPaper onlydraft
Retail buyers are out of scopeNamed markets locklive
Any raise completes with the issuer’s counsel and providers — not on RCA PadFixed-fee termslive
Production date for the chain layer is not committedDesk filedraft
No public token is sold on this padEngagement terms + posture locklive
Customers contemplated: Brussels, United KingdomNamed markets on the filedraft

On the record

  1. Application APP-4655ScreenSep
  2. Counsel questionPathSep

Operating log

  1. 02 Sep 14:00

    Application scored. Ebb Clear is not a calendar slot.

  2. 10 Sep 10:12

    Counsel question sent. Name a path or lock not-offering.

Path to now

  1. Now

    Screen

    Calendar is never automatic.

  2. Next

    Counsel or close

    A named path, or a locked not-offering.

Not a subscription

This is not a sale page.

Too early to talk about a round on this pad. Screen first. A path has to be named by counsel before anyone should wire. Founders who want a pack like this one apply. Readers who want the company talk to the company — not to this pad.