Board

HAZ7

Closed
CLOSEDCollateral records

Hazel Post

Window closed. 5,752 asked while it was live. You are reading history.

Heat 30. Window 0d. If you are going to read one Collateral records company, this is the one.

Hazel Post — A system of record for private-credit funds and desks: tapes, RFQs, or covenants that update when a borrower files. The buyers already have a book. This is plumbing, not a venue that matches strangers.

Closed on this board. Any capital event was completed with the issuer’s own providers. RCA Pad took 0%.

Closed. The live conversation is over. The pack remains as archive.

Diligence, not a prospectus. RCA Pad does not allocate, take orders, or close funding. If this company raises, it raises with its own counsel.

Waitlist

0

Window

Closed

Heat

0/99

Inbound / wk

0asks

Asking now

0live

Named pilots

0

Redacted on the public page

Live nodes

0

Margin ledger

Counsel hours

0

Edinburgh · closed private round

Sentences killed

0

Before listing

Claims live

0/11

Growth

Our cut

0%

Of any proceeds

Plate Ledger · 8798

HAZ7

The plate

Ledger. Edition 8798.

A unique plate for Hazel Post. Geometry, orbit, and edition belong to this company — no other listing on the board shares it.

HAZ7 · Edinburgh · Collateral records

Score

0

Desk diligence

Pilots

0

Named, redacted

Waitlist

0

Product demand

HQ

Edinburgh

Private-credit funds

Sells

Desk

Desk seat

Markets

0

Edinburgh

Years

0

Founded 2021

Surfaces

0

Margin ledger

Complete

0

File readiness

The wedge

Desk seat

They sell a faster close to administrators, not access to a crowd.

Why the desk took it

A real job, not a ticker.

A redacted facility list landed in week one.

Traction

4 named pilots (redacted).

Founded 2021, headquartered in Edinburgh. 4 named pilots on file (identities redacted in public). 5,752 on the waitlist, gated — product demand, not a book built. 23 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 89/100. A coverholder or carrier running one binder on this record. Architecture says keys / title / NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Hazel Post.

Next 12 months

Securities memo on the tape itself — is the record a security? Write it down.

Closed RFQ wires do this slowly. Hazel Post does it as a record. Bps on a job that already has a budget line. A public coin would not make the invoice larger.

The brief

How a serious reader should hold this.

The decline pile in Collateral records is not a rumour. It is how this board stays readable. Hazel Post is what survived. That is the sell.

What you can verify today is smaller than the slide. What you cannot verify is named as a question, not a promise. That is the difference between this company and a pad listing — and why the waitlist is not a coin queue.

The auditor of a redacted pilot has seen a dual-record. Switching away now means a new auditor conversation. That is the switching cost — not the logo.

From the pilot

This communication is not an offer. Participation mechanics do not exist on this pad. If a later reader treats the public stack as the offer, the stack was already wrong.

From counsel

US persons are outside the audience. A form that asks “are you accredited?” without verification is not an exemption.

From the screen

The legal source of truth stays with the incumbent register, admin, or custodian. Hazel Post does not attest to its own facts.

The window

Miss this and you read the archive.

The incumbent will still be slow in a year. The window will not.

5,752 people did not join a waitlist for a ticker. They joined for a job.

The scarce thing is not the company. It is the next 0 days of a live conversation.

Window

Closed

Closed. History only — not a place to buy.

Sentences killed
17
Counsel hours on file
76
Asks / week
719
Our cut
0% of proceeds

US came off the site in the first session. We did not argue. We are not children.

Aisha Moreau, Chief executive

This company

Hazel Post

Services firms hide in ‘platform’ language. Hazel Post sells a seat plus an event. Named.

In the same conversation

  • eFront
  • Allvue
  • Closed RFQ wires
  • Not an on-chain lending pool

The bet

Why this company exists.

They sell a faster close to administrators, not access to a crowd.

They sell a faster close to administrators, not access to a crowd.

Allocators want daily marks and covenant visibility. Banks want to originate without building a chain team. The first honest tape that does not pretend to be an exchange will be paid for as software.

Private credit AUM is measured in trillions. The software take-rate is small. The switching cost, once a tape is the record, is not.

Versus the field

The incumbent brand sells the relationship. Hazel Post sells the job the brand will not staff. A protocol pitch is the thing this company has already refused. Open-source looks free until the auditor asks who attests.

Edinburgh being the city does not make local retail a default audience. Communications capable of inducing investment activity still have a promotions problem.

How it works

  1. 01A loan or covenant event is written once
  2. 02Permissioned counterparties see what they are allowed to see
  3. 03Marks and RFQs stay inside named desks
  4. 04No public order book, no retail
  5. 05Default and amendment events are first-class, not a PDF in a side channel
  6. 06Retail and unnamed geographies are structurally off the form, not only in the footer.

In the same conversation as

  • eFront
  • Allvue
  • Closed RFQ wires
  • Not an on-chain lending pool

If they raise

Where the money would actually go.

Not a token float. A budget against work. RCA Pad still takes 0% of proceeds.

  • Named operators

    39%

    Keeping the public story from running ahead of the claims register.

  • Claims & campaign ops

    24%

    A counsel memo that can survive a later reader.

  • Control environment

    20%

    Hiring the operator who already does this job at a licensed firm.

  • Counsel & perimeter

    17%

    Adapter work against the incumbent register, admin, or custodian.

Operating week

What “in market” actually looks like.

  1. WedCounselPerimeter diffs. If the site drifted from the memo, the site moves — not the memo.
  2. MonClaimsEvery public sentence checked against the register. Anything extra is unpublished.
  3. SunOwnersWho can decide messaging and budget on a recorded line. If the answer is nobody, stop.
  4. SatDarkNo creators. No threads. Restricted geos stay dark.

The wedge

Why this one, not the other one.

They sell
Desk seat
Who pays
A coverholder or carrier running one binder on this record.
Unit economics
Bps on a job that already has a budget line. A public coin would not make the invoice larger.
Moat on file
Covenant language mapped to the LMA set — not a custom dialect.
Switching cost
Permissioned connectivity is the moat. Public endpoints would erase it.
Vs the comps
Closed RFQ wires do this slowly. Hazel Post does it as a record.
Why we listed it
A redacted facility list landed in week one.

Next twelve months

What has to be true.

Securities memo on the tape itself — is the record a security? Write it down.

Architecture says keys / title / NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Hazel Post.

If they raise, it is to hire the remaining certifications and the second market — not to float a coin.

Traction

What you can verify today.

Founded 2021, headquartered in Edinburgh. 4 named pilots on file (identities redacted in public). 5,752 on the waitlist, gated — product demand, not a book built. 23 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 89/100. A coverholder or carrier running one binder on this record. Architecture says keys / title / NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Hazel Post.

  • Operating notes for Margin ledger
  • No token contract listed as a public sale
  • Pilot letters on file, identities redacted
  • Edinburgh is the operating centre
  • The waitlist, if any, is a product list — not a book
  • Raise, if any, closed with issuer providers

Readiness

Six things a serious buyer asks. 100 is “ready to take to counsel and a customer.”

  • Product95
  • Customers96
  • Legal path84
  • Tech maturity94
  • Demand69
  • Market access68

Risks

What can kill it.

The one that actually kills it

The unit of account becomes a token

Seat plus event. If they attach a token as the unit of account, this company is a different company — and not one we will operate a campaign for.

Marketplace slip

The moment this looks like a public book, it is a venue. This pad will not list that.

Data rights

Who owns the tape when a fund leaves? If that is unsigned, the enterprise value is a conversation.

Credit cycle

A default cluster will test whether the product is a record or a reputation.

Retail

Retail is prohibited. Any ‘access token’ story is a different company.

Data rights on exit

If a fund leaves and the tape stays, who owns the history? Unsigned, the enterprise value is a conversation.

Facts vs theatre

A proof of a fake book is still a fake book. Hazel Post has to attach to the real one, in Edinburgh.

Ask these next

  1. 01Where do keys, title, or NAV liability sit — and is that person licensed?
  2. 02If RCA Pad disappeared tomorrow, could the customer still run the job?
  3. 03Who can unpublish a public sentence in 24 hours, by name?
  4. 04What happens if a founder later wants a public token?
  5. 05Is the waitlist demand for a product, or a queue for a coin?
  6. 06Which incumbent can copy this in a quarter, and what would they have to migrate?

Structure

How money would actually move.

Window closed. Tombstone is theirs. Archive is ours. 0% of proceeds.

Entity
Hazel Post Ltd
Path on file
Edinburgh · closed private round
Posture
Window closed
Pack
Growth

Where they can operate

Named vs off-limits.

Named markets are where a sentence is allowed. Restricted is where it is not. This is not a worldwide offering.

  • Edinburghnamed
  • United Kingdomnamed
  • EU retailrestricted
  • United Statesrestricted

Team

Who runs it.

  • Aisha MoreauChief executive

Stack

  • Margin ledger
  • Collateral records
  • Approval trail
  • Audit log

Who can decide

The technical founder is on the record as engineering. Contractors in undisclosed jurisdictions are written down as a fact, not hidden. Facts can be managed. Hiding them is how companies die in diligence.

Year two is a second named market and the remaining certifications — still permissioned. It is not a public book. A public book would be a different company.

Claims with evidence

Statements with evidence.

StatementEvidenceStatus
Hazel Post does not sell a token to the public on this padPosture lockwithdrawn
The product is collateral records sold to institutionsArchitecture + customer typewithdrawn
Margin ledger is the method — not a listed assetDesk snapshotwithdrawn
Retail buyers are out of scopeNamed markets lockwithdrawn
Any raise completes with the issuer’s counsel and providers — not on RCA PadFixed-fee termswithdrawn
Production date for the chain layer is not committedNo board minutewithdrawn
No public token is sold on this padEngagement terms + posture lockwithdrawn
Customers contemplated: Edinburgh, United KingdomNamed markets on the filewithdrawn

On the record

  1. Final registerArchiveAug
  2. Close reportReportAug
  3. Tombstone copyArchiveAug

Operating log

  1. 19 Aug 10:00

    Close report. 0% of proceeds.

  2. 12 Aug 18:00

    Hazel Post archived. Live claims withdrawn.

  3. 11 Aug 09:30

    Final creator pass. Residual claims pulled.

Path to now

  1. Open

    File

    Before any public sentence.

  2. Close

    Archive

    We did not take a cut.

Not a subscription

This is not a sale page.

Window closed. Tombstone is theirs. Archive is ours. 0% of proceeds. Founders who want a pack like this one apply. Readers who want the company talk to the company — not to this pad.