Board

OSIZ

In diligence
IN MOTIONClearing

Osier North

Certification is in motion. After it lands, access is the scarce thing — not price.

Stockholm is not a backdrop. It is the city where the customer can be called on a recorded line.

Osier North — A permissioned netting engine for trading venues and brokers that are already licensed. It reduces what has to settle. It is not a new CCP, and it is not a collateral token.

In a 14-day diligence sprint (day 6). This is when the story, the customers and the legal path get written down — or the file stops.

Heat 39 of 99. Hot windows do not stay hot. They close.

Diligence, not a prospectus. RCA Pad does not allocate, take orders, or close funding. If this company raises, it raises with its own counsel.

Sprint day

0/14

Window

Closed

Heat

0/99

Inbound / wk

0asks

Asking now

0live

Named pilots

0

Redacted on the public page

Live nodes

0

Permissioned netting

Counsel hours

0

Not offering — locked

Sentences killed

0

Before listing

Claims live

5/9

Sprint

Our cut

0%

Of any proceeds

Plate Orbit · 7112

OSIZ

The plate

Orbit. Edition 7112.

A unique plate for Osier North. Geometry, orbit, and edition belong to this company — no other listing on the board shares it.

OSIZ · Stockholm · Clearing

Score

0

Desk diligence

Pilots

0

Named, redacted

Sprint

0

Day 6 of 14

HQ

Stockholm

Licensed venues

Sells

Venue

Venue licence add-on

Markets

0

Sweden

Years

0

Founded 2026

Surfaces

0

Permissioned netting

Complete

0

File readiness

The wedge

Venue licence add-on

They will not tokenise margin. That sentence is why they are on this board.

Why the desk took it

A real job, not a ticker.

They did not claim to be a CCP. Counsel will still ask.

Traction

One named pilot (redacted).

Founded 2026, headquartered in Stockholm. One named pilot on file (redacted in public). 8 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 77/100. Sprint day 6 of 14. A treasurer at a bank that already settles — not a crypto-native desk. Architecture says keys / title / NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Osier North.

Next 12 months

A default drill with a number, not a narrative.

Calastone-style utilities move funds. This moves risk. They win if they are cheaper than the internal build, not cheaper than a protocol.

The brief

How a serious reader should hold this.

The decline pile in Clearing is not a rumour. It is how this board stays readable. Osier North is what survived. That is the sell.

What you can verify today is smaller than the slide. What you cannot verify is named as a question, not a promise. That is the difference between this company and a pad listing — and why the waitlist is not a coin queue.

A dual-control drill sits on paper. Keys, title, or NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Osier North. The architecture says so. We have not watched the drill live. That is the next ask, not a slogan.

From ops

Fixed fee. Deposit to start. 0% of proceeds. Token-only pay is declined. Percentage of raise is declined.

From counsel

A dual-control drill exists on paper. Production evidence is the next artefact, not a tweet.

From the founder

US persons are outside the audience. A form that asks “are you accredited?” without verification is not an exemption.

The window

Miss this and you read the archive.

Waiting for a proposed US rule is how you miss a Stockholm buyer who already has budget.

Restricted markets stay dark. Named markets are live. That discipline is the scarce thing.

Read it once, properly, while the number is still green. Then decide.

Window

Closed

Closed. History only — not a place to buy.

Sentences killed
15
Counsel hours on file
33
Asks / week
21
Our cut
0% of proceeds

The waitlist is people who want the product. If they wanted a coin they would be on a different pad.

Rafa Park, Chief executive

This company

Osier North

The protocol pitch is the thing this company has already refused.

In the same conversation

  • LCH / Eurex (incumbent CCPs)
  • Caldastone-style utilities
  • Not a DeFi clearinghouse

The bet

Why this company exists.

They will not tokenise margin. That sentence is why they are on this board.

They will not tokenise margin. That sentence is why they are on this board.

T+1 and capital rules make gross settlement expensive. Venues will buy netting as a service before they will buy a new licence.

Post-trade cost is a line on every broker P&L. A 10% cut in settlement fails is a CFO conversation.

Versus the field

A generalist vendor can copy the slide in a quarter. They cannot copy the named record, the scheme map, or the auditor conversation. That is the year they would have to buy.

Named: Sweden, EEA professional, United Kingdom. Off-limits: Public residual claims. A US person hearing an offering communication is a US problem even if the company sits in Stockholm. Blocking an IP and taking a US Telegram admin is not a block.

How it works

  1. 01Members post positions they already hold
  2. 02The engine nets what the rulebook allows
  3. 03Only the residual hits the existing settlement rail
  4. 04Collateral as a token is an exclusion on this file
  5. 05Only the residual hits the existing settlement rail — gross never leaves the venue
  6. 06Kill of a public sentence is an hour, not a committee.

In the same conversation as

  • LCH / Eurex (incumbent CCPs)
  • Caldastone-style utilities
  • Not a DeFi clearinghouse

If they raise

Where the money would actually go.

Not a token float. A budget against work. RCA Pad still takes 0% of proceeds.

  • Control environment

    39%

    Keeping the public story from running ahead of the claims register.

  • Second market

    26%

    The remaining certifications and the second named market.

  • Certifications & adapters

    22%

    Hiring the operator who already does this job at a licensed firm.

  • Claims & campaign ops

    13%

    Dual-control drills, key ceremonies, and the person who owns them.

Operating week

What “in market” actually looks like.

  1. TueExceptionsOvernight breaks post back into the customer’s case system. No side book.
  2. MonClaimsEvery public sentence checked against the register. Anything extra is unpublished.
  3. FriKill switchRehearse unpublish in 24 hours. If it takes a committee, it is not a switch.
  4. WedCounselPerimeter diffs. If the site drifted from the memo, the site moves — not the memo.

The wedge

Why this one, not the other one.

They sell
Venue licence add-on
Who pays
A treasurer at a bank that already settles — not a crypto-native desk.
Unit economics
They win if they are cheaper than the internal build, not cheaper than a protocol.
Moat on file
Named venue LOIs — redacted, but they exist.
Switching cost
The customer’s auditor has seen this book. Switching means a new auditor conversation.
Vs the comps
Calastone-style utilities move funds. This moves risk.
Why we listed it
They did not claim to be a CCP. Counsel will still ask.

Next twelve months

What has to be true.

A default drill with a number, not a narrative.

Architecture says keys / title / NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Osier North.

Capital would fund the adapter work and a named counsel memo, not a public sale.

Traction

What you can verify today.

Founded 2026, headquartered in Stockholm. One named pilot on file (redacted in public). 8 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 77/100. Sprint day 6 of 14. A treasurer at a bank that already settles — not a crypto-native desk. Architecture says keys / title / NAV liability sit with a named licensed party — not Osier North.

  • Operating notes for Permissioned netting
  • No token contract listed as a public sale
  • Named founder; customer still a conversation
  • Stockholm is the operating centre
  • The waitlist, if any, is a product list — not a book
  • RCA Pad does not take a cut of proceeds

Readiness

Six things a serious buyer asks. 100 is “ready to take to counsel and a customer.”

  • Product69
  • Customers40
  • Legal path62
  • Tech maturity60
  • Demand42
  • Market access90

Risks

What can kill it.

The one that actually kills it

The named customer is a letter of intent

Pilots that cannot be named, even redacted, are theatre. One paying seat that an auditor has seen is worth more than a waitlist of a short list.

CCP perimeter

If a regulator reads this as clearing, the licence problem is existential.

Collateral token

That ask has been refused on files like this. It should stay refused.

Member default

Who eats the loss? If the answer is ‘the protocol’, there is no protocol that can.

Incumbent freeze-out

CCPs can copy the netting logic faster than a startup can collect members.

CCP copy

The incumbent can ship the same netting as a feature. Osier North has to be cheaper or faster before that happens.

Path silence

If counsel will not name a path and not-offering is not locked, heated waitlist copy is an accidental offering.

Ask these next

  1. 01Where do keys, title, or NAV liability sit — and is that person licensed?
  2. 02Which geography is actually locked, and which is a hope?
  3. 03What happens if a founder later wants a public token?
  4. 04What does renewal look like if no round ever happens?
  5. 05Who is the first named paying customer — not a letter of intent?
  6. 06Has counsel written the perimeter in a memo you can file?

Structure

How money would actually move.

Sprint is diligence, not a raise. A pack at the end is a file the company can take to its own lawyers and investors. RCA Pad does not complete funding.

Entity
Osier North AB
Path on file
Not offering — locked
Posture
Private only
Pack
Sprint

Where they can operate

Named vs off-limits.

Named markets are where a sentence is allowed. Restricted is where it is not. This is not a worldwide offering.

  • Swedennamed
  • EEA professionalnamed
  • United Kingdomnamed
  • Public residual claimsrestricted

Team

Who runs it.

  • Rafa ParkChief executive

Stack

  • Permissioned netting
  • Clearing
  • Disclosure templates
  • Takedown SLA

Named with them

  • Northbridge Counsel
  • Helix Audit
  • Meridian Tax

Who can decide

Rafa Park came in named. The team is not a handle. Osier North AB exists, founded 2026, headquartered in Stockholm. Anonymity would have been an automatic decline.

A second counterparty writing into the record is the only network effect that counts. One customer is a consultancy. Two is a market.

Claims with evidence

Statements with evidence.

StatementEvidenceStatus
Osier North does not sell a token to the public on this padPosture locklive
The product is clearing sold to institutionsArchitecture + customer typelive
Permissioned netting is the method — not a listed assetDesk snapshotlive
Retail buyers are out of scopeNamed markets locklive
Any raise completes with the issuer’s counsel and providers — not on RCA PadFixed-fee termslive
Production date for the chain layer is not committedNo board minutedraft
No public token is sold on this padEngagement terms + posture locklive
Customers contemplated: Sweden, EEA professional, United KingdomNamed markets on the filelive

On the record

  1. Day 0 lockKick-offSep
  2. Claim inventoryPackSep
  3. Audience matrix draftPackSep

Operating log

  1. 11 Sep 14:43

    Workshop. Funnel has no purchase step.

  2. 08 Sep 09:00

    Kick-off. Exclusions recorded.

  3. 09 Sep 16:20

    A claim killed for missing evidence.

Path to now

  1. D0

    Kick-off

    Geographies, owners, SLA, exclusions.

  2. D14

    Read-out

    Accept the pack or stop.

Not a subscription

This is not a sale page.

Sprint is diligence, not a raise. A pack at the end is a file the company can take to its own lawyers and investors. RCA Pad does not complete funding. Founders who want a pack like this one apply. Readers who want the company talk to the company — not to this pad.