The wedge
Fund seat
Revocation is the product. Anyone can issue; almost no one can take it back.
VELMVellum Protocol8,420 waitlistKITEKite Ledger2,190 waitlistPLSDPalisade ID1,640 waitlistNRTLNorthlineDay 8 of 14SABLSable RailDay 5 of 14QULLQuill MarketsDay 11 of 14CDWLCinder Well6,947 waitlistHRTNHartline8,787 waitlistOBSNObsidian Rail4,416 waitlistFENLFen Clearing1,060 waitlistLUMNLumen Books5,510 waitlistRDCTRedact ID6,485 waitlistHRBNHarbor NAV6,973 waitlistQLTDQuilt1,876 waitlistNMBMNimbus Match7,864 waitlistBRASBrass4,166 waitlistSLSTSolstice Credit9,342 waitlistWLTRWillow Transfer7,031 waitlistEMBREmber Registry2,487 waitlistNQAYNorth Quay2,013 waitlistKLNSKiln4,412 waitlistGLSHGlass HouseDay 8 of 14IRNPIron PierDay 1 of 14PLFRPale FireDay 3 of 14VELMVellum Protocol8,420 waitlistKITEKite Ledger2,190 waitlistPLSDPalisade ID1,640 waitlistNRTLNorthlineDay 8 of 14SABLSable RailDay 5 of 14QULLQuill MarketsDay 11 of 14CDWLCinder Well6,947 waitlistHRTNHartline8,787 waitlistOBSNObsidian Rail4,416 waitlistFENLFen Clearing1,060 waitlistLUMNLumen Books5,510 waitlistRDCTRedact ID6,485 waitlistHRBNHarbor NAV6,973 waitlistQLTDQuilt1,876 waitlistNMBMNimbus Match7,864 waitlistBRASBrass4,166 waitlistSLSTSolstice Credit9,342 waitlistWLTRWillow Transfer7,031 waitlistEMBREmber Registry2,487 waitlistNQAYNorth Quay2,013 waitlistKLNSKiln4,412 waitlistGLSHGlass HouseDay 8 of 14IRNPIron PierDay 1 of 14PLFRPale FireDay 3 of 14
Board
OSI7
In market
HOT WINDOWAttestationsOsier Post
Skip it and you read a PDF. Counterparties who matter will have already called.
If this pad disappeared tomorrow, the customer could still run the job. That is why they are here.
Osier Post — An attestation graph: a fund or investor proves one fact (accredited, name, share-class) to a transfer agent or administrator without handing over the whole file. Selective disclosure is the product.
Live campaign. 9,029 on the product waitlist — that is demand, not an allocation.
Most Attestations applications this quarter were declined. You are looking at one that was not.
Diligence, not a prospectus. RCA Pad does not allocate, take orders, or close funding. If this company raises, it raises with its own counsel.
Waitlist
0
Window
Closed
Heat
0/99
Inbound / wk
0asks
Asking now
0live
Named pilots
0
Redacted on the public page
Live nodes
0
W3C attestations
Counsel hours
0
Warsaw · counsel-named
Sentences killed
0
Before listing
Claims live
11/12
Growth
Our cut
0%
Of any proceeds
Plate Horizon · 7277
OSI7
The plate
Horizon. Edition 7277.
A unique plate for Osier Post. Geometry, orbit, and edition belong to this company — no other listing on the board shares it.
OSI7 · Warsaw · Attestations
Score
0
Desk diligence
Pilots
0
Named, redacted
Waitlist
0
Product demand
HQ
Warsaw
Fund administrators
Sells
Fund
Fund seat
Markets
0
Warsaw
Years
0
Founded 2022
Surfaces
0
W3C attestations
Complete
0
File readiness
Why the desk took it
A real job, not a ticker.
US retail identity was taken off before we asked.
Traction
5 named pilots (redacted).
Founded 2022, headquartered in Warsaw. 5 named pilots on file (identities redacted in public). 9,029 on the waitlist, gated — product demand, not a book built. 20 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 88/100. A national registry counterpart, not a scrape. Counsel is named, even if the memo is still a draft. Unnamed counsel is how files die.
Next 12 months
Three funds onboarding on the graph, not a demo.
Jumio does not speak share-class. They win if they are cheaper than the internal build, not cheaper than a protocol.
The brief
How a serious reader should hold this.
The first sentence Siobhán Berg would not let us publish was the exciting one. What remains is slower — and scarcer: Osier Post Ltd selling Attestations as software, from Warsaw, to a buyer who already pays someone else to do this badly. That buyer is named. You are not, yet.
The bet is narrow. A named Warsaw buyer already has budget for this invoice. Osier Post wins if it is cheaper than the internal build and cleaner than the protocol pitch. It loses if a founder later wants a public book. The window is the time you have to decide which it is.
US traffic was taken off the public surfaces in the first working session. Osier Post did not argue. Adult companies do not costume a US offering.
From the screen
This communication is not an offer. Participation mechanics do not exist on this pad. If a later reader treats the public stack as the offer, the stack was already wrong.
From counsel
Fixed fee. Deposit to start. 0% of proceeds. Token-only pay is declined. Percentage of raise is declined.
From the founder
We will not describe this as Reg CA-compliant, MiCA-stickered, or FCA-authorised. Issuers retain their own counsel in every relevant jurisdiction.
The window
Miss this and you read the archive.
Waiting for a proposed US rule is how you miss a Warsaw buyer who already has budget.
The incumbent copy takes a year. The named customer is already writing into this record.
If you are a founder who wants a pack like this: apply. If you are a buyer: call them — not us.
Window
Closed
Closed. History only — not a place to buy.
- Sentences killed
- 15
- Counsel hours on file
- 51
- Asks / week
- 1,129
- Our cut
- 0% of proceeds
Kill the public sentence in an hour or do not list us. We can do the hour.
This company
Osier Post
A generalist vendor copies the slide. They cannot copy the named record.
In the same conversation
- Onfido / Jumio for people
- Fund-admin KYC teams
- W3C attestations
- Not a ‘passport token’
The bet
Why this company exists.
Revocation is the product. Anyone can issue; almost no one can take it back.
Revocation is the product. Anyone can issue; almost no one can take it back.
Transfer agents and AIFMs are being asked for faster onboarding without becoming identity companies. Attestations they can revoke are the compromise.
Fund onboarding cost is a known line item. A 20–40% cut in cycle time is a budget, not a vision deck.
Versus the field
L2 wrappers are cheaper. They are also a different perimeter — and declined here. Osier Post is priced as software against an invoice that already exists.
The live path is Warsaw · counsel-named. Proposed Regulation Crypto Assets is not treated as a calendar slot. Build as if it never opens.
How it works
- 01A fact is attested by a party the recipient already trusts
- 02The holder discloses only the field requested
- 03The rest of the file stays dark
- 04Revocation is a first-class event
- 05The recipient never sees the rest of the file — selective disclosure is enforced, not promised
- 06Exceptions post back into the customer’s existing case system — no side spreadsheet.
In the same conversation as
- Onfido / Jumio for people
- Fund-admin KYC teams
- W3C attestations
- Not a ‘passport token’
If they raise
Where the money would actually go.
Not a token float. A budget against work. RCA Pad still takes 0% of proceeds.
Claims & campaign ops
40%
The remaining certifications and the second named market.
Named operators
28%
Dual-control drills, key ceremonies, and the person who owns them.
Counsel & perimeter
22%
Hiring the operator who already does this job at a licensed firm.
Control environment
10%
A counsel memo that can survive a later reader.
Operating week
What “in market” actually looks like.
- WedCounselPerimeter diffs. If the site drifted from the memo, the site moves — not the memo.
- ThuCustomerNamed pilot (redacted) sees the same record the auditor saw.
- SatDarkNo creators. No threads. Restricted geos stay dark.
- SunOwnersWho can decide messaging and budget on a recorded line. If the answer is nobody, stop.
The wedge
Why this one, not the other one.
- They sell
- Fund seat
- Who pays
- A national registry counterpart, not a scrape.
- Unit economics
- They win if they are cheaper than the internal build, not cheaper than a protocol.
- Moat on file
- Revoke has been tested against a live register.
- Switching cost
- Permissioned connectivity is the moat. Public endpoints would erase it.
- Vs the comps
- Jumio does not speak share-class.
- Why we listed it
- US retail identity was taken off before we asked.
Next twelve months
What has to be true.
Three funds onboarding on the graph, not a demo.
Counsel is named, even if the memo is still a draft. Unnamed counsel is how files die.
Growth money would extend the record to a second geography, still permissioned.
Traction
What you can verify today.
Founded 2022, headquartered in Warsaw. 5 named pilots on file (identities redacted in public). 9,029 on the waitlist, gated — product demand, not a book built. 20 nodes or connected surfaces reported. Desk diligence score 88/100. A national registry counterpart, not a scrape. Counsel is named, even if the memo is still a draft. Unnamed counsel is how files die.
- Operating notes for W3C attestations
- No token contract listed as a public sale
- Named founder; customer still a conversation
- Warsaw is the operating centre
- The waitlist, if any, is a product list — not a book
- RCA Pad does not take a cut of proceeds
Readiness
Six things a serious buyer asks. 100 is “ready to take to counsel and a customer.”
- Product78
- Customers96
- Legal path84
- Tech maturity94
- Demand85
- Market access44
Risks
What can kill it.
The one that actually kills it
A second geography without a lock
Extending the record into a market that is still restricted is how a clean Warsaw story becomes a fact pattern. The restricted list exists for a reason: EU retail, United States.
Who attests
If the attester is the company itself, this is a database with extra steps.
Portability theatre
A graph nobody else reads is a PDF with a hash.
US
US retail identity products are a different statute. Many of these files keep the US off.
Utility token
Paying for attestations in a native token is usually a securities problem in costume.
Self-attestation
If Osier Post is the attester, this is a database with extra steps. The graph only matters if someone else signs.
Incumbent feature
The administrator, CCP, scheme or custodian can ship this as a checkbox. Osier Post has to be cheaper or faster before that happens.
Ask these next
- 01Who is the first named paying customer — not a letter of intent?
- 02Which incumbent can copy this in a quarter, and what would they have to migrate?
- 03What does renewal look like if no round ever happens?
- 04Where do keys, title, or NAV liability sit — and is that person licensed?
- 05If RCA Pad disappeared tomorrow, could the customer still run the job?
- 06What happens if a founder later wants a public token?
Structure
How money would actually move.
If this company raises, it raises with its own counsel and providers. The waitlist is a product list. It is not a round, a book, or an allocation on RCA Pad. We do not take a cut.
- Entity
- Osier Post Ltd
- Path on file
- Warsaw · counsel-named
- Posture
- Private only
- Pack
- Growth
Where they can operate
Named vs off-limits.
Named markets are where a sentence is allowed. Restricted is where it is not. This is not a worldwide offering.
- Warsawnamed
- EU retailrestricted
- United Statesrestricted
Team
Who runs it.
- Siobhán BergChief executive
- Aisha AdeyemiHead of product
Stack
- W3C attestations
- Attestations
- Approval trail
- Audit log
Named with them
- Meridian Tax
Who can decide
Siobhán Berg (Chief executive) will take a 30-minute call and decide budget. If the only person who can accept “we are not opening a sale” is a silent co-founder in another time zone, this company would not be on the board.
A second counterparty writing into the record is the only network effect that counts. One customer is a consultancy. Two is a market.
Claims with evidence
Statements with evidence.
| Statement | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Osier Post does not sell a token to the public on this pad | Posture lock | live |
| The product is attestations sold to institutions | Architecture + customer type | live |
| W3C attestations is the method — not a listed asset | Desk snapshot | live |
| Retail buyers are out of scope | Named markets lock | live |
| Any raise completes with the issuer’s counsel and providers — not on RCA Pad | Fixed-fee terms | live |
| Production date for the chain layer is not committed | Desk file | draft |
| No public token is sold on this pad | Engagement terms + posture lock | live |
| Customers contemplated: Warsaw | Named markets on the file | live |
On the record
- Sprint packPackJun
- Counsel lockPathJul
- Claims register liveRegisterAug
- Creator briefBriefSep
Operating log
11 Sep 09:49
Takedown SLA idle-tested.
08 Sep 11:40
A claim held for missing evidence.
04 Sep 08:22
Weekly report issued to the desk.
01 Sep 14:08
Creator set on disclosure. No buy language.
Path to now
Sprint
Pack accepted
Narrative, matrix, claims locked.
Path
Counsel names it
Or the file stays not-offering.
Live
Campaign
Waitlist and register. No purchase journey.
Not a subscription
This is not a sale page.
If this company raises, it raises with its own counsel and providers. The waitlist is a product list. It is not a round, a book, or an allocation on RCA Pad. We do not take a cut. Founders who want a pack like this one apply. Readers who want the company talk to the company — not to this pad.
Other companies
VELMVellum ProtocolSettlement rails for private credit funds. Campaign live. No public token sale.KITEKite LedgerTrade-finance records on a permissioned L2. Live waitlist. Allocation is not on this pad.PLSDPalisade IDPermissioned identity for funds. Live in the EEA professional lane. No token, no sale.NRTLNorthlineOn-chain fund admin. Day 8 of 14. The pack is the product. Pathway locked: not offering.